ARCHIVE FOR THE ‘blumberg-associates’ CATEGORY

Michael Blumberg reveals some of the key findings of the latest research into field service Scheduling and Dispatch to come out of Blumberg Associates...

A critical success factor in managing a Field Service Organization (FSO) is the ability to effectively schedule and dispatch field service engineers (FSEs).

It is about making sure that technicians arrive at the customers’ site at the right time with the proper tools, knowledge, and resources to resolve the problem during their initial visit.

First Time Fix is the name of the game in field service. FSOs run the risk of incurring additional costs and damaging their customer satisfaction any time their First Time Fix target is in jeopardy.

There’s a lot at stake for FSOs when it comes to effectively scheduling and dispatching FSEs. There are significant challenges for FSOs, particularly if many service visits are required each day, dispatching is made from a large pool of FSEs, and the FSO is financially penalized by the customer when response time commitments or Service Level Agreement (SLAs) are not met.

 

"First Time Fix is the name of the game in field service. FSOs run the risk of incurring additional costs and damaging their customer satisfaction any time their First Time Fix target is in jeopardy..."

 

Over the last 10-20 years, FSOs have turned to advanced tools and technology to automate the scheduling and dispatch process to improve this activity.

These tools range from appointment setting applications to dynamic scheduling software based on artificial intelligence and operations research algorithms.

To understand how these tools are deployed in the field as well their impact on service performance, Blumberg Advisory Group and Field Service Insights in conjunction with Timing Software conducted a benchmark study among 150 FSOs. In this article, we will examine the impact of automated appointment booking applications and dynamic scheduling functionality on performance.

Most FSOs had limited flexibility in their appointment booking process.

 

• 59% offered their customers the first available time slot while the remaining 40% provided their customer with alternative options
• Approximately half (49%) set appointments 5 days out or longer. This reflects that they have limited ability to handle emergency and/ or expedited requests.
• Less than one-third (30%) were capable of booking appointments 1 to 2 days in advance. However, nearly two-thirds (65.7%) utilized automation to help identify or locate available appointment times.
• Almost three-quarters relied on the automation supplied by their CRM/ERP software vendor.
• Less than 9% utilized a separate, best of breed scheduling solution for appointment booking, while the remaining depended on a customized system developed in-house.

 

FSOs who utilize automated appointment booking offer a better customer experience than those who do not.

There is a higher level of customer engagement because it provides the customer with options and a feeling of control when service is provided.

Companies that utilize this functionality are four times as likely to handle a 500 or more service requests per day and experience a higher FSE to Dispatcher ratio that those who do not.

The second step from booking an appointment is the actual scheduling of FSEs.

 

• One half assigned FSEs to customer sites based on their skill set, availability, and proximity.
• Remaining 50% either determined the schedule for their FSEs by dispatching the same FSE to the same site every time or assigned the same FSE to the same site having the FSE determine their own schedule.

 

Two-thirds of survey respondents utilized an automated process/system.

Approximately half (51%) used software that contains some type of algorithm which optimizes scheduling based on specific criteria (e.g., cost, travel time, etc.) or pre-defined factors. Less than one-third (31%) have a scheduling system on a rules-based engine. The remaining 17% have an AI based system that improves their scheduling process based on dynamic variables.

 

"FSEs who use automated scheduling software are 47% more likely to complete 5 or more service visits per day..."

 

The use of automated scheduling software has several benefits to FSOs. Our survey results indicate companies who utilize this type of software are 45% more likely to handle 100 or more service requests per day.

They are also 39% more likely to experience an SLA compliance rate of 90% or higher. In addition, they are twice as likely to have FSE rates of 85% or higher.

 

Furthermore, FSEs who use automated scheduling software are 47% more likely to complete 5 or more service visits per day.

Our findings suggest that appointment setting functionality plays a critical role in improving customer experience, increasing service productivity, and operating an efficient dispatch centre.

Automated scheduling software provides measurable improvements with respect to FSE productivity and efficiency. In the last year, 99% of FSOs surveyed incurred a financial penalty or were required to provide a customer rebate for missing SLA/response time targets. Almost half (45%) missed these targets more than 24 times last year.

The use of advanced tools and technology like automated booking and scheduling software will have a significant improvement in reducing or eliminating the frequency of these occurrences.

 

---

Be social and share...

Michael Blumberg, President of Blumberg Advisory Group and founder of fieldserviceinsights.com discusses some of the most crucial mistakes field service companies can make when utilising contingent or seasonal labour...

Field Service Organizations (FSOs) in North America, UK, and Europe are increasingly turning toward crowdsourcing platforms and subcontractors to augment their field workforce.

This type of outsourcing strategy enables FSOs to become more agile in meeting customer demands for service. As a result, they [FSOs] are able to reduce costs and improve service productivity. In addition, crowdsourcing and contingent labour helps solve the problem of finding skilled labour on a rapid basis.

Turning to subcontractors and crowdsourcing platforms does involve relinquishing some level of control over the labour force.However, turning to subcontractors and crowdsourcing platforms does involve relinquishing some level of control over the labour force. Naturally, questions emerge about the reliability, expertise, and quality of technicians that are sourced through these options.

Over the last two years, we have spoken with dozens of companies who have or currently utilize contingent labour to either augment their existing workforce or gain greater agility and efficiency over the entire field service delivery process. The majority are satisfied with their external providers and report positive results on key performance metrics such as First Time Fix and SLA Compliance/Onsite Arrive Time.   On the other hand, a few anomalies exist where the performance of contingent labour did not meet the FSOs expectations.

Quite often, FSOs who experience subpar performance make critical mistakes when retaining and managing contingent labour.

Here is our perspective on the biggest mistakes they need to avoid:

1. Failure to fully vet individual technicians doing the work

Don’t assume that every contract technician (e.g., subcontractor, freelance, crowdsource) you dispatch has the skills, training, and experience necessary to complete the work properly and in a timely manner. Insist on viewing background checks, certifications, and credentials of every contract technician assigned to your company.

2. Failure to train and onboard technicians

Quite often companies issue work orders without to contract technicians without training or guiding them on how they'd like the work to be performed.

For example, they do not explain how they'd like the tech to greet the customer and/or notify the customer when the work is complete.  Fortunately, Internet-based learning systems make it possible for companies to train and onboard contractors in a cost-effective and rapid manner.

3. Failure to communicate with contractors

This is the biggest mistake that a company can make is hand off work orders as if they were tossing a hot potato over a fence.

This will result in problem with respect to key service performance metrics such as SLA compliance, First Time Fix, and No Fault Found.  It is important that companies provide contractors with detailed and specific instructions about the activities they need to perform on each assignment.

At the same time, contractors also need to communicate with the companies that hire them on the status of calls, issues or problems they are experiencing, and results of their actions.

4. Failure to integrate contract or crowdsourced technicians into their service delivery process

Problems can occur when there is too much of an arm’s less relationship between the company and the contractor.  In other words, there is little accountability, visibility, and control between the company and contractors/technicians, and vice versa.

The key to success lies in treating contractors as an extension of your company.  Companies can achieve this outcome by leveraging communication technology, collaboration tools, and workforce automation software.  Relying on these systems will ensure the company achieves best in class service performance through its contractor network.

In summary, FSOs experience challenges to crowdsourcing when they underestimate the level of due diligence, systems, and processes they need to put in place when utilizing this type of labour. This does not necessarily mean that they must make huge capital investments.

FSOs experience challenges to crowdsourcing when they underestimate the level of due diligence, systems, and processes they need to put in place when utilizing this type of labourRather, they are urged to design and implement processes and procedures by leveraging existing infrastructure when they can.

Devoting the time and effort to this initiative will pay off. Our research suggests that FSOs who have an unpleasant experience with contingent labour do so because they rush into the decision without much thought, planning, and preparation.

Basically, they are looking to solve an immediate problem with no consideration to future. In other words, they are taking a tactical approach to labour shortages where a strategic solution is required.

Be social and share

In the Big Discussion, we will take one topic, bring together three leading experts on that topic and put three key questions to them to help us better understand its potential impact on the field service sector...

This issue our topic is the what to expect in 2018 and our experts are Michael Blumberg, Blumberg Advisory, Bill Pollock, Strategies for GrowthSM and Jan Van Veen, moreMomentum

The first question we tackled was What is the biggest challenge facing field service companies in the next 12 months?

Now let's turn to the second question in the discussion...

What is the biggest opportunity facing field service companies in the next 12 months?

Bill Pollock: The biggest opportunity facing field service companies today is the ability to compete head-to-head with any of their main competitors – however large or small – through the implementation and/or upgrade to a Cloud-based Field Service Management (FSM) solution. Over the past several years, Cloud technology has normalized the playing field for both FSM solution providers and their customers, who are no longer encumbered by the cost and complexity of their legacy premise-based solutions and applications.

Advances in technology are also giving a boost to those field service companies that have embraced these new technologies. For example, the greatest opportunities over the next 12 months will most likely be realised by those companies that will have already implemented Augmented Reality (AR) and/or Merged Reality (MR) into their field service operations. However, the most likely dominant field service organisations will be the ones that have also taken steps to explore the benefits of moving to an Artificial Intelligence- (AI) and Machine Learning- (ML) driven field service solution.

The technology is already there for every field service company; however, only those that embrace – and implement – these technologies will actually be able to reap the benefits.

 

---

 

Jan Van Veen:  When talking about the biggest opportunities, I think we need to look beyond 12 months. It is mission critical to act now on future success.

Most industries are somewhere around the top of the life cycle and are facing (first signs of) commoditization.

The big opportunity for them is to go through the next life cycle where the added value is about enhancing the use of technology. The new value propositions will be heavily driven by data, algorithms and intelligence. The value will be far beyond predictive maintenance and uptime of technology.

This is a domain in which young, rapidly growing data-driven companies are in their comfort zone. So, the opportunity here is moving up the food chain and increase relevance for clients. By failing to pursue these opportunities, the threat is being forced down in the food chain and seeing other players deliver the high value, whilst seeing your role being limited to manufacturing equipment, spare parts and, to some extent, delivering low skilled hands-on machines for maintenance.

For those companies who are not ready to focus on these opportunities, I think your top priority should be to build the missing foundation and make sure you are ready to pursue the opportunities soon.

 

---

Michael Blumberg: The biggest opportunity facing field service companies in the next 12 months lies in pursuing strategies that will advance their journey along the path toward servitization.

The specific strategies vary from company to company based on where they are on their journey. For some companies, 2018 will be the year when they finally transition their field service operation from a cost centre to a profit centre. For others, the opportunity lies in monetizing service offerings and effectively marketing and selling service outcomes.

Still, others will have the opportunity to invest in digital technologies that enhance service quality, boost productivity, and create an uber-like experience for their customers.

---

Be social and share

In the Big Discussion, we will take one topic, bring together three leading experts on that topic and put three key questions to them to help us better understand its potential impact on the field service sector...

This issue our topic is the what to expect in 2018 and our experts are Michael Blumberg, Blumberg Advisory, Bill Pollock, Strategies for GrowthSM and Jan Van Veen, moreMomentum

So let's tackle the first question...

What is the biggest challenge facing field service companies in the next 12 months?

Bill Pollock: The biggest challenge facing field service companies in the next 12 months will be keeping up with customer expectations for service delivery as they continually raise the bar with respect to performance. This is not necessarily a “new” challenge – it actually has been one of the main challenges for field service companies year-after-year. However, the current environment of constantly improving technology and its availability through both the traditional, “tried-and-true” FSM solution providers plus the introduction of several new technology-based solution vendors makes this challenge particularly daunting for many field service managers.

Selecting which technology to implement is not the only challenge, however; field service companies must also be able to choose the right solution vendor to help them design, implement and support their newly acquired technology. Some of the most challenging questions may be, “If we’re already using Microsoft Dynamics 365 for our CRM solution, should we also use Microsoft Field Service?”; similarly, “If we’re already using Salesforce for our sales and marketing management, should we also use their Field Service Lightning solution?” Other questions may include, “Should we use one of the traditional FSM solution providers, such as Astea, ClickSoftware, IFS/Metrix, ServicePower, etc., or one of the newer providers?”; or “Should we use a UK-based solution provider, such as Fast Lean Smart, or Kirona, etc., rather than an off-shore-based provider?”

The choices are many – and no less challenging than they have been in the past!

---

Jan Van Veen:  Most manufacturing companies and their service units struggle to innovate and change quick enough.

Technology is developing at an increasing pace; adoption of new technology has never been so rapid. In the digital era, we can expect competition from new entrants like innovative data- and algorithm-driven businesses.

So, the name of the game now is ‘Adapt and Thrive’ (or ‘Stagnate and Die’). The winners of the next decades will be those who can maintain a high speed of business innovation and change, and can cope with a high level of uncertainty and unpredictability.

What is holding most manufacturing companies back is;

• Slow change, whether it’s small change or bigger change
• Stuck in business-as-usual: innovations are predominantly incremental improvements of the status quo
• Lack of influence: individuals at all levels and in various departments see the threats, opportunities and the lack of progress, which frustrates them

I believe that one of the biggest challenges right now is to increase momentum for rapid and fluent change from the inside, and empowering employees at all levels to take ownership.

---

Michael Blumberg:  In the short term, field service companies must also find ways to balance service quality and productivity with their financial goals and objectives (think costs and profits), all while striving to maintain exceptional levels of customer satisfaction and loyalty.

This objective holds true for any 12-month period under consideration whether the year is 2018, 2008, or 2028.

The challenge lies in developing and implementing a winning strategy based on current financial and operating constraints that each company faces.

---

Be social and share