ARCHIVE FOR THE ‘service-and-sales’ CATEGORY

Jim Baston, the author of Beyond Great Service, tackles one of the most prominent questions amongst field service organizations - can service technicians sell without jeopardizing their trusted advisor status?

Two years ago I gave a presentation about the customer service value inherent in business promotion by field service personnel. I had an audience of almost 100 service managers and business owners.

I asked, by show of hands, how many of them had formal or informal expectations of their field service teams to look for new business opportunities.

About 60 to 70% of the attendees put up their hands.

I then asked the group how many of them told their customers that they had encouraged their field teams to look for opportunities.

No one put up their hand.

Although my research involved a very small and somewhat unscientific sample, I think this anecdote provides an indication of how many service managers and executives view the role of selling by their field service team.

In most cases, it appears that their view is that this activity is a means to increase revenues for the service provider.

How excited would your customers be if you told them that you encouraged your field service team to look for more business so that you could make more money from their current service relationship with you?If this is the case, then it is understandable if they regard this activity as a benefit for their companies, but not necessarily as a benefit for their customers. As a result, they may be having difficulty articulating a benefit that they themselves may not see exists.

For example, how excited would your customers be if you told them that you encouraged your field service team to look for more business so that you could make more money from their current service relationship with you?

And so the idea of sales by service professionals is somehow tainted. It is sometimes viewed as a dirty word. When we feel that way, we may encourage selling by our field service team but we certainly are not going to let our customers know we are doing so.

But does it have to be this way? Does sales have to be a dirty word in service?

What if our focus on business promotion by field professionals was not on increasing revenues, but increasing service levels?

What if we saw selling by our field service teams as a way to help our customers to achieve results they did not think were possible? What if we positioned opportunity identification by the field service team as a service to help our customers realize their business goals?

What if we discouraged selling for the sake of gaining more business alone but rather insisted that any recommendations by field service professionals be directly tied to a benefit for the customer?

It seems to me that if we take this “service” view of sales by our field service team, then their efforts become an integral part of the service – as important a service as their ability to install, maintain, troubleshoot and repair.

If we take this “service” view of sales by our field service team, then their efforts become an integral part of the service – as important a service as their ability to install, maintain, troubleshoot and repair.Recognizing that business promotion is an integral part of the service suggests that this activity will also be more readily accepted by the field service team themselves. My experience suggests that, in general, field service people are not overly fond of salespeople.

Those that feel this way resent being put in a position where they have to sell and therefore do not approach this task enthusiastically if they approach it at all. But if they recognize their selling efforts as a service, they will more likely embrace the initiative.

When we regard selling as part of the service, we can be more comfortable in telling our customers about what we are doing.

In fact, we can use our efforts to differentiate our service from our competitors. Imagine the value you communicate when you advise your customers that you have encouraged your field team to contribute their heads as well as their hands.

That you have requested that your field team use their knowledge of each customer’s processes and systems combined with their technical expertise and understanding of the customer’s goals, to look for ways to help your customers make improvements aimed at achieving their business goals.

You could even ask your customers for permission for your field team to sell to them. “Mr. or Mrs. Customer, we have encouraged our field service team to use their knowledge and expertise to look for ways to help you be more successful.

If they find something that they feel will benefit you and your business in some way, would you have any objection if they brought that to your attention?”

It is also interesting to note that research suggests that our customers want us to be proactive in making recommendations.

One study found that 75% of customers that left one vendor to give their business to another were actually satisfied or very satisfied at the time that they left.One study found that 75% of customers that left one vendor to give their business to another were actually satisfied or very satisfied at the time that they left.

Further investigation showed that the reason that they left, despite the fact that they were satisfied, was that they felt that the vendor that they were going to, was in a better position to help them achieve their long-term goals.

So, thinking about your business, is sales, when conducted by your field service team considered a dirty word?

If you’re not sure, ask yourself this question.

“Would I tell my customers what we are doing?” If your answer is “no” or “not sure”, then perhaps you have some work to do.

Be social and share

In the Big Discussion we will take one topic, bring together three leading experts on that topic and put four key questions to them to help us better understand its potential impact on the field service sector...

This issue our topic is the relationship between Service and Sales and our experts are Nick Frank of Si2 Partners, Michael Blumberg of Blumberg Advisory Group and Jim Baston of BBA Consulting

In the first instalment of this topic our experts answered the question "It is often said service technicians are the greatest salesmen – what are your views on this?" and the second time out the question was Is there a difference between selling service and selling products?

and now onto the third question of the topic...

 

---

 

Is incentivising service technicians to “sell” opening up new revenue streams or putting their “trusted advisor” status at risk?

 

---

 

Technicians represent a ready and available channel for generating incremental service revenues.

After all, they are at the customer site almost every day.

However, service technicians may become over-zealous or pushy about selling, and jeopardise their “trusted advice” status, if they lack proper sales training or if their performance measurement system and company culture are too focused on sales.

 

---

 

A sales professional is a very different person from the service expert in terms of how they think and what motivates them. The service person is more motivated by relationship and recognition of their skills and it is this that allows them to develop the trust-based relationships that make them so special from a commercial perspective.

Companies should use this relationship to increase value, but be aware that as soon as the balance swings from supporting customer success to earning a sales commission, this trust immediately evaporates. To be successful, the question of incentives is critical yet very contextual to the business environment and company culture. Rarely is sales commission the answer as service peoples are not typically sales animals.

Usually having incentives through management objectives or even reward and recognition will encourage the desired behaviours without risking the Trusted Advisor relationship

 

---

 

I am very wary about incentivising service professionals for making recommendations. When we provide commissions or other forms of compensation for selling services to the customer, it sends a message that promoting a service to the customer is an act outside of their normal job.

We are asking them to provide “something extra”. It’s the “while you are there” approach. If making recommendations that will benefit the customer are perceived as an “add on” activity, then this suggests that service professionals can opt out. As I indicated above, I see promoting services as a service itself and therefore as much a part of the job as everything else that they do. Incentives can also encourage the field service professional to make recommendations for the wrong reasons (to get the commission as opposed to acting in the best interests of the customer).

Evidence also suggests that incentivising can actually discourage the type of behaviour it was intended to boost. Daniel Pink’s book Drive – The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us (New York: Riverhead Books, 2009), provides a wonderful and often counter intuitive account of the impact of extrinsic rewards on employee performance.

Finally, what if the customer asks? What does the field service professional tell their customer if asked if they are getting compensated for make the recommendation? The customer may feel uncomfortable if the technician answers yes. How would you feel if you found out that your auto mechanic was commissioned on all parts sold?

 

---

 

Look out for the final part of this series when we ask our panel "What impact does the rising uptake in outcome based services have on the relationship between service and sales?"

 

---

 

Be social and share this feature

In the Big Discussion we will take one topic, bring together three leading experts on that topic and put four key questions to them to help us better understand its potential impact on the field service sector...

This issue our topic is the relationship between Service and Sales and our experts are Nick Frank of Si2 Partners, Michael Blumberg of Blumberg Advisory Group and Jim Baston of BBA Consulting

So with three fantastic experts lined up lets dive straight into the first question of the series...

 

---

 

It is often said service technicians are the greatest salesmen – what are your views on this?

 

---

 

Service technicians bring a perspective and outlook that makes them great at sales in certain situations. For example, where the sale solves a critical problem for the customer.

Basically, customers appreciate the fact that service technicians are problem solvers and place the customer’s need first. As a result, the service technician has trust and credibility with the customer.

In turn, the customer is highly likely to act on the service technician’s recommendations. Sometimes, the only way a technician can solve the customer’s problem is by having them buy something new like a spare part, new piece of equipment, or value-added service offering.

In these situations, the sale is not viewed as a sale at all by the customer but merely as an attempt by the technician to solve the customer’s problem.

 

---

 

To believe service technicians are the greatest salesmen is to misunderstand the true skills of sales professionals. These are people who have the skills, mind-set and drive required to identify and close new customer opportunities.

It is very different from the more nurturing and customer focused individuals usually found in field service. That said, selling is a team effort and many people are involved in to the GoTo market process. In some respect everyone sells the company and the service technician has an important a role as anyone else. Through being the person who sees the customer more than pretty much anyone else in the organisation, they are ideally positioned to advise the customer on services that can improve value, or identify new opportunities.

But playing an active role in the sales process should not be confused with the sales professional who is accountable for closing deals.

 

---

 

I guess it depends on your definition of “salesperson”. If you mean the ability to recognise opportunities and be successful in helping the customer make a decision to purchase, then this statement is true.

Field service professionals are in a unique position. They understand the technology and where it is going. They know the equipment the customer has and what they are trying to achieve. They have proximity to the customer and generally high levels of trust.

However, I have concerns over the term “salespeople” when it comes to field service professionals.

I take the perspective that when a field service professional brings a product or service that will benefit the customer in some way to that customer’s attention, then that is a service rather than a sale. It’s part of the value that the field service professional brings. It is every bit as important as that field service professional’s ability to troubleshoot and repair.

Those field service professionals that recognise this are usually very successful because they see their role as helping the customer and the customer has confidence in the validity of their recommendations and trust in their motives.

 

---

 

Look out for the next part of this series when we ask our panel "Is there a difference between selling service and selling products?"

 

---

 

Be social and share this feature

Michael Blumberg, President of the Blumberg Advisory Group discusses recent research his organisation worked on with Giuntini and Company on the processes being used to effectively sell extended warranty programs and argues that if you adopt the right approach, moving from customised service contracts to selling outcome based services isn’t such a huge leap of evolution...

No one can dispute the fact that manufacturers are placing increased attention on growing top line service revenue. Typically, this revenue is captured through the sale of EW/ES programs.

Given the level of focus place on this subject by manufacturers and service providers, Blumberg Advisory Group and Giuntini and Company partnered to conduct a study among professionals involved in selling extended warranty and/or extended service programs. To qualify as a survey participants, respondents had to influence, recommend or make decisions about these programs.

The objective in conducting the survey was twofold: To identify best practices involved in marketing and selling extended warranty and/or extended service (EW/ES) programs and to evaluate the impact of these practices on key performance indicators (KPIs).

 

As field service leaders may recognise, contract attachment and contract renewal are the most important Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) associated with marketing and selling of EW/ES programs. Interestingly, we found that only a small number (less than 22%) of survey participants have achieved best in class performance metrics of greater than 50% for contract attachment or 75% for contract renewal rates.

 

The factors that drive contract attachment rates are warranty configuration and the types of marketing tactics employed.

Configuration refers to the length of coverage, level of customisation, processes engaged and resources employed in delivering the warranty, and entitlement levels offered. The survey results suggest that the more distinctions a company can make about its EW/ES program, they more likely customers will be to purchase it.

In other words, customers consider the value of a service contract before they purchase it.

This is an “eye-opener” because many companies have the view that a warranty is a warranty. The management within these companies believe that just because customers purchase their product they’ll also purchase the extended warranty.

Most of the companies we surveyed rely on traditional marketing tactics like sales aids (e.g. brochures) and direct sales to sell EW/ES programs. Usually, these tactics are employed at the product point of purchase.

 

However, companies who continue to sell service contracts after the product sale are likely to experience a 20% improvement in attachment rates on average. Other sales and marketing tactics which have proven to be effective in driving attachment rates include customer testimonials, reputation management, telemarketing (i.e., outbound sales), public relations (e.g., press releases, article placement, etc.) and analyst reviews.

 

Manufacturers who experience high EW/ES contract attachment and renewal rates understand that the activities involved in marketing and selling these programs is separate and distinct from those involved in selling products.

In other words, service leaders in these best in class companies put as much time and effort into configuring, marketing, and selling service contracts as their counterparts in the product organisation place on designing, marketing and selling products.

Effective field service leaders recognise that service won’t sell itself. They understand that just because the customer owns the product doesn’t guarantee they’ll buy the service. In addition, field service leaders in these service organisations make sure they have the right systems and processes in place to market and sell service contracts.

 

For example, processes and systems that facilitate a company’s ability to configure, price, and quote customised service contracts. While 87.5% of companies surveyed have a formal process in place to configure and price service programs, only 13% employ a Configure, Price, and Quote (CPQ) software application.

 

The trend toward customers wanting to buy outcomes as opposed to services or products will place even more pressure on field service leaders to become proficient at configuring, pricing, quoting, and selling service contracts.

While recent technologies like IoT, AI, and Big Data will make it easier for companies to deliver outcomes, manufacturers still need to provide customers with a contract that specifies exactly what is include in the “outcome” they have purchased.

For example, it defines the terms and conditions, the hours of coverage, the level of availability, the resources provided, and the processes engaged in delivering the agreed upon outcome to the customer. It also describes the level of entitlements and roles and responsibilities of the party providing the outcome as well as the party receiving the outcome.

Furthermore, it is likely that outcomes may differ from customer to customer.

Manufacturers who have not mastered the fine art of selling traditional service programs may find selling outcome based services a real nightmare.

Yet in many ways, selling an outcome based contact is no different than selling a customised extended warranty or extended service contract.

That’s why companies need to start investing in systems and processes that facilitate configuration, pricing, and quotation of services contracts today.

 

---

 

Be social and share this feature

Field Service consultant and author Jim Baston begins a new series in which he has kindly agreed to serialise his industry focussed book Beyond Great Service for Field Service News readers. Here in the first part of this new exclusive series he introduces the series...

Welcome to the first in a series of articles based on my book, Beyond GREAT SERVICE – The Technician’s Role in Proactive Business Growth.

Beyond GREAT SERVICE is written for those who are responsible for field service operations and who believe that the technician’s role is more than maintaining, troubleshooting and repairing equipment. It is for those business leaders who recognise that the proactive effort of technicians to identify and recommend products and services to their customers is a valuable service.

The book is a fictional account about Charlie, a service manager who discovers the secret of successfully engaging his field service team in conversations with their customers about the products and services they provide. As part of his education, he uncovers the pitfalls that will limit his success, and plans a way to address them. Most importantly, Charlie comes to recognise that the proactive efforts of his team are a critical part of the overall service his company provides, not an add-on selling activity. This last point brings clarity of purpose to the initiative for everyone involved and allows his team to move forward with enthusiasm.

 

In this series of articles, I will be following Charlie’s journey and draw on the lessons he has learned along the way. We will see how his perception of the role of the field service team changes and how that change allows him to clearly see the task ahead of him. I will end each article with a series of questions that I hope you will find helpful in analysing your own service business.

The themes that will be covered in these articles include:

• Recognizing the role of field service in business promotion as a service. Here we will examine what we are asking the field service team to do through their proactive efforts and why. Although the field service team’s efforts are often confused with selling, we will explore the importance of ensuring that everyone involved recognizes their efforts as a critical part of the service provided. This is an important concept to grasp, as it will guide the direction the initiative will take and provide inspiration for those involved.
• Understanding the critical factors that will determine success. Here we will consider those factors that will be critical to the success of the initiative. In my experience, some of these are “elephants in the room” (we know they exist but don’t want to acknowledge them) and others may not have been considered. Regardless, these are all factors that, if not addressed, will greatly limit the success of the initiative.
• Involving the customer. As Charlie develops the plan, he seeks feedback from key customers to get their reaction and input. We will examine the value of taking this step and provide suggestions on how it can be accomplished.
• Differentiating based on the field service team’s efforts. If the proactive efforts of the field service team are indeed a service to the customer, shouldn’t we treat it as we would any other service that we provide? We will consider how we can differentiate our service business by promoting the efforts of our field service team to our customers. This is the opportunity for a service company to stand out from its competitors by truly working collaboratively with their customers.
• Measuring, monitoring and continuous improvement. Here we will look at what we can do to measure the effectiveness of our efforts and use that information to fine tune our service offering.

My hope is that these series of articles will be of value to service companies in all stages of engaging their field service teams in business development – from those who have not yet started, to those who have formal initiatives in place.

For those not yet started, my goal is to provide a blue print that you can follow to help you achieve your goals faster and avoid some of the common pitfalls. For those already underway, my hope is that these articles will provide inspiration and ideas that will contribute to the effectiveness of your initiative.

 

The book, Beyond GREAT SERVICE – The Technician’s Role in Proactive Business Growth is available on my website at www.jimbaston.com. There you will also find a copy of my latest book, the Beyond GREAT SERVICE Planning Guide.

The Planning Guide is a step-by-step approach to planning and implementing a strategy to focus the entire field service organisation on identifying and recommending actions that their customers can take to be measurably better off. The Planning Guide is intended to help you to ensure that all aspects of your field service organisation – from technicians to supporting infrastructure - are aligned and focused on delivering a service which is “Beyond GREAT”.

An electronic copy of my book is available for download from www.amazon.com or www.amazon.ca. Just type in “Beyond GREAT SERVICE” in the search bar.

I value your feedback about my articles and insight into your own experiences in engaging your field service teams in business development. You can reach me by email at jim@jimbaston.com.

---

Be social and share this feature